Rivets are ubiquitous in aircraft manufacturing. A Boeing 737 uses around 300,000 rivets, while an Airbus A380 requires over 6 million. Though widely adopted in automobile and shipbuilding, welding is only marginally applied to key structural joints of aircraft. This choice is not driven by cost, but by the aviation industry's ultimate pursuit of safety and reliability. An analysis of material properties, structural stress and maintenance reveals why rivets remain the top choice for aircraft assembly.
Aviation-specific materials make welding impractical while highlighting the advantages of rivets. Modern airliner fuselages and wings are mainly made of lightweight high-strength aluminum alloys, titanium alloys and the like, with aluminum alloys accounting for over 70%. These materials have inherent drawbacks when welded. Aluminum features high thermal conductivity, which easily creates heat-affected zones with coarse grains and a strength drop of more than 30%. Its low melting point also leads to oxide film formation during welding, resulting in internal defects such as pores and slag inclusions. Such flaws will propagate rapidly under high altitude and pressure, and eventually cause structural fracture. As a mechanical joining method, riveting involves no high-temperature heating and fully preserves the original mechanical properties of base materials. For instance, the commonly used 2117-T4 aluminum alloy rivet boasts a shear strength of 190 MPa, with a material matching rate above 95% against substrates, delivering robust joints.
In terms of stress bearing, riveted joints far outperform welded joints in fatigue resistance. During takeoff, cruising and landing, aircraft fuselages and wings are subjected to repeated alternating loads. Wings bear upward lift during takeoff and downward pressure during landing, with load directions switching dozens of times per flight. Welded joints are rigid and prone to stress concentration at weld seams. Under alternating loads, tiny cracks expand 5 to 8 times faster at weld roots than at riveted joints. By contrast, riveted connections have moderate flexibility. Minor displacement of rivets inside holes effectively disperses alternating loads and reduces stress concentration. Aviation test data proves that under identical working conditions, the fatigue life of riveted joints is 3 to 5 times that of welded joints, which is critical for aviation safety with zero tolerance for failures.
Easy maintenance further consolidates the dominant position of rivets. Aircraft must undergo comprehensive inspections after traveling certain distances. Internal defects in welds are hard to detect. Even with ultrasonic testing operated by skilled technicians, the detection rate for pores and micro-cracks is below 80%. Undetected flaws may trigger severe safety hazards after maintenance. Riveted joints enable intuitive and efficient inspection. Loosening, deformation, raised heads and other failures of rivets can be identified visually. Defective rivets can be replaced directly within 3 to 5 minutes. This quick inspection and replacement feature cuts aircraft downtime and maintenance costs substantially.
The irreparability of welding fundamentally conflicts with aircraft's fault tolerance requirements. Once defects occur on welds, re-welding will further impair the performance of surrounding materials, creating a vicious cycle of weakening structures. Local flaws on large welded components may even render the whole part scrapped. Riveting, however, offers excellent fault tolerance. The failure of a single rivet will not compromise overall structural stability, and performance can be fully restored after replacement. Take aircraft skin joints as an example: if one rivet loosens, adjacent rivets will share the load temporarily and win time for maintenance. Such redundant design cannot be achieved by welding.
It is worth noting that welding is not entirely excluded from aircraft manufacturing. High-precision processes such as laser welding are applied to partial joints of non-primary load-bearing components including engine combustion chambers and landing gear. Nevertheless, rivets are still adopted for core load-bearing structures. This differentiated application combines the sealing advantage of welding and the structural safety guaranteed by rivets.
From the perspective of the fastener industry, aircraft rivets represent the core value of high-end fasteners in key manufacturing sectors. Aviation-grade rivets have far stricter requirements than ordinary fasteners: the dimensional tolerance is controlled within ±0.01 mm, surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.8 μm, and each product must pass more than 20 rigorous tests including hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue tests. Such stringent standards drive technological upgrading across the fastener industry. Breakthroughs such as cold heading technology for titanium alloy rivets and anti-loosening rivets for high-temperature service are all developed to meet aviation demands.
To sum up, aircraft's preference for rivets over welding is a scientific decision based on the safety-first principle. Rivets excel in material compatibility, fatigue resistance and maintainability, fully complying with the rigorous standards of the aviation industry. For fastener practitioners, understanding the technical logic behind this choice clarifies the R&D direction of high-end fasteners and highlights the foundational role of fasteners in modern manufacturing. As aviation technology evolves, the materials and processes of rivets keep improving, yet their leading status in aircraft joining will remain unshaken in the long run.